R (on the application of SY (BY HER LITIGATION FRIEND SP)) (Claimant) v DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (Defendant) & AHMED BAIG (Interested Party) (2018)

A prosecutor’s decision not to charge a man with the rape of a woman with learning difficulties was not irrational. The circumstances of the man’s acquittal some years earlier on charges of sexual activity with a person with a mental disorder impeding choice were such that the prosecutor had been right to conclude that the […]

Read More

R v T (2006)

It was not for the courts to assess the reasons behind the prosecution’s decision to charge an individual under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 s.8 rather than s.5 or s.9 and, in the circumstances, a sentence of five years’ imprisonment imposed on the individual was not manifestly excessive.

Read More