Top Rape Defence Barrister

R v C (2011)

Although cross-examination which had invited impermissible speculation by the defendant should not have been allowed, that was insufficient to support a conclusion that his conviction for rape, buggery and indecent assault was unsafe, there being no other basis on which to undermine the jury’s acceptance of the significant DNA evidence.

Contact Stephen Vullo KC

Please use the form below to make contact. Your email will be responded to promptly (we endeavour to respond to all email enquiries within one hour). Alternatively, call Stephen's firm on +44 (0) 203 846 5801.

Your name*
First Last
Your email address:*
Enter Email Confirm Email
Your telephone number*
Your message for Stephen*
Email
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.