R (on the application of NE) (Claimant) v BIRMINGHAM MAGISTRATES’ COURT (Defendant) & CHIEF CONSTABLE OF THE WEST MIDLANDS (Interested Party) : R (on the application of NM) (Claimant) v BIRMINGHAM MAGISTRATES COURT (Defendant) & CHIEF CONSTABLE OF THE WEST MIDLANDS (Interested Party) (2015)

A person subject to the notification requirements of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 who wished to challenge a decision of a magistrates’ court to uphold a refusal to review the notification requirements should bring an appeal by way of case stated rather than pursue an application for judicial review.

Read More

R v DP (2013)

A discretionary life sentence imposed under the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 for assault on a child under 13 by penetration was not excessive. The offender was a predatory paedophile with previous convictions for sexual offences against children and the offence was of sufficient seriousness to warrant life imprisonment.

Read More

R (on the application of COMMISSIONER OF POLICE OF THE METROPOLIS) (Claimant) v CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT (Defendant) & (1) MG (2) CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE (Interested Parties) (2013)

Despite a substantial delay in applying for judicial review, it was in the public interest to quash a court’s decision purporting to lift a sexual offender’s notification requirements. The court lacked power to make that order, and the grant of relief upheld the rule of law and ensured that all applications to life notification requirements […]

Read More

R (on the application of JF (BY HIS LITIGATION FRIEND OF)) v SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT : R (on the application of ANGUS AUBREY THOMPSON) v SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT (2009)

The Sexual Offences Act 2003 s.82 was incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 art.8 in subjecting certain sex offenders to notification requirements indefinitely without the opportunity for review. As a matter of principle, an offender was entitled to have the question of whether the notification requirements continued to serve a legitimate purpose […]

Read More

R V B (2005)

There was no power to add an extended sentence to a detention and training order under the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 s.85 .

Read More