R (on the application of NE) (Claimant) v BIRMINGHAM MAGISTRATES’ COURT (Defendant) & CHIEF CONSTABLE OF THE WEST MIDLANDS (Interested Party) : R (on the application of NM) (Claimant) v BIRMINGHAM MAGISTRATES COURT (Defendant) & CHIEF CONSTABLE OF THE WEST MIDLANDS (Interested Party) (2015)

A person subject to the notification requirements of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 who wished to challenge a decision of a magistrates’ court to uphold a refusal to review the notification requirements should bring an appeal by way of case stated rather than pursue an application for judicial review.

Read More

R (on the application of COMMISSIONER OF POLICE OF THE METROPOLIS) (Claimant) v CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT (Defendant) & (1) MG (2) CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE (Interested Parties) (2013)

Despite a substantial delay in applying for judicial review, it was in the public interest to quash a court’s decision purporting to lift a sexual offender’s notification requirements. The court lacked power to make that order, and the grant of relief upheld the rule of law and ensured that all applications to life notification requirements […]

Read More