Convictions for sexual offences were safe despite the fact that material about the complainant had not been disclosed to the defence, because the picture of the complainant put before the jury was nevertheless a sufficiently accurate one.
Convictions for sexual offences were safe despite the fact that material about the complainant had not been disclosed to the defence, because the picture of the complainant put before the jury was nevertheless a sufficiently accurate one.
ADMISSIBILITY BAD CHARACTER CAUSING CHILDREN TO WATCH SEXUAL ACTS CRIMINAL CASES REVIEW COMMISSION CRIMINAL EVIDENCE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE FABRICATION OF EVIDENCE PROSECUTION DISCLOSURE PROSECUTION WITNESSES SEXUAL ACTIVITY WITH CHILDREN
A sentence of 17 years and 2 months’ imprisonment with an eight-year extension period imposed for child sex offences was justified as the offender had carried out the systemic and sustained abuse of his step-daughter from age 6 to 11 and of her cousin, who suffered from autism, at age 12.
AGGRAVATING FEATURES CAUSING CHILDREN TO ENGAGE IN SEXUAL ACTIVITY CAUSING CHILDREN TO WATCH SEXUAL ACTS CHILD PORNOGRAPHY OFFENCES CHILD SEX OFFENCES EXTENDED SENTENCES POSSESSION OF PROHIBITED IMAGES OF CHILDREN RAPE OF CHILD UNDER 13 SENTENCING SEXUAL ASSAULT OF CHILD UNDER 13 STARTING POINT STEPFATHER ABUSING CHILDREN UNDER 12 OVER NUMBER OF YEARS
Please use the form below to make contact. Your email will be responded to promptly (we endeavour to respond to all email enquiries within one hour). Alternatively, you can call Stephen's firm, Twelve Tabulae Limited, on +44 (0) 203 846 5801.