An offender’s convictions for historic offences of rape, buggery, attempted rape, indecent assault and murder were deemed safe, as the judge had given the jury adequate directions as to the dangers of delay and its effect on the evidence.
“HISTORIC” OFFENCES ADMISSIBILITY ADMISSION OF HISTORIC EVIDENCE ATTEMPTS BUGGERY CONFESSIONS CRIMINAL EVIDENCE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE DELAY EFFECT ON FAIRNESS OF TRIAL INDECENT ASSAULT JURY DIRECTIONS MURDER POLICE INTERVIEWS PREJUDICE RAPE SEXUAL OFFENCES SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN CHARGING OFFENDER
Where a defendant made admissions of offences to a probation officer those admissions could be relied on by the prosecution. Although those situations would be unusual, the court could provide sufficient protection to the defendant to prevent unfairness.
ADMISSIBILITY ADMISSIONS MADE IN INTERVIEWS WITH PROBATION OFFICERS AGREED BASIS CONFESSIONS CONVICTION SAFE CRIMINAL EVIDENCE CRIMINAL LAW CRIMINAL PROCEDURE GUILTY PLEAS INDECENT ASSAULTS INTERVIEWS JUDGE’S DISCRETION OFFENDERS PACE 1984 POLICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE ACT 1984 s.78 POWERS OF CRIMINAL COURTS (SENTENCING) ACT 2000 PRE-SENTENCE REPORTS PROBATION OFFICERS PUBLIC POLICY RAPES S.78 POLICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE ACT 1984 UNFAIRNESS
Please use the form below to make contact. Your email will be responded to promptly (we endeavour to respond to all email enquiries within one hour). Alternatively, you can call Stephen's firm, Twelve Tabulae Limited, on +44 (0) 203 846 5801.