Top Rape Barrister and Leading Criminal KC
Call now: +44 (0) 203 846 5801
≡
  • Home
  • Expertise
    • Rape Defence Barrister
    • Sexual Assault
      • Assault By Penetration Defence Barrister
      • Assault By Touching Defence Barrister
      • Administering Substances Defence Barrister
    • Underage sex
      • Grooming
    • Exploitation
    • Porn / Voyeurism
  • Criminal Appeals
  • Bail
  • Direct Access
  • Contact
  •  Call +44 (0) 203 846 5801
Top Criminal Barrister QC and Leading Rape Defence Counsel

MEDICAL EVIDENCE

February 5, 2019

The Criminal Cases Review Commission had been justified in refusing to refer the claimant’s two convictions for sexual offences to the Court of Appeal. The fresh evidence on which he had sought to rely did not give rise to a real possibility that the convictions would not be upheld.

ASSAULT BY PENETRATION CONVICTIONS CRIMINAL CASES REVIEW COMMISSION CRIMINAL EVIDENCE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE EXPERT EVIDENCE FRESH EVIDENCE MEDICAL EVIDENCE RAPE

December 21, 2018

The conviction of a vulnerable adult with a severe learning disability for the offence of sexual activity by a care worker with a person with a mental disability was unsafe, and was accordingly quashed, where inadequate consideration had been given to his learning disability in the course of the trial. Fresh psychological evidence demonstrated that he would have had difficulty in dealing with leading questions asked in cross-examination, and that might have left the jury with a false impression.

CRIMINAL APPEAL ACT 1968 s.23(2)(b) CRIMINAL EVIDENCE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES 2015 Pt 19 r.19.6(2)(b) FRESH EVIDENCE JURY DIRECTIONS LEARNING DISABLED PERSONS MEDICAL EVIDENCE MENTALLY DISORDERED PERSONS SEXUAL OFFENCES SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT 2003 s.38 SOCIAL CARE WORKERS VULNERABLE DEFENDANTS

November 18, 2015

A conviction for sexual offences against a child was safe, as medical evidence adduced as fresh had not permitted confident review of a previous diagnosis so as to describe it as ill-founded; taken at its highest it neither supported nor refuted the allegations against the offender. The defence was still that any abuse was perpetrated by another and the jury had decided on the non-medical evidence.

CHILDREN CONVICTION FOR SEXUAL OFFENCES AGAINST CHILD CRIMINAL EVIDENCE CRIMINAL LAW EFFECT OF FRESH MEDICAL EVIDENCE FRESH EVIDENCE GROSS INDECENCY INDECENT ASSAULT MEDICAL EVIDENCE RAPE

June 10, 2015

Developments in medical knowledge that reduced the diagnostic significance of physical signs of abuse in children did not render a conviction prior to the change in approach unsafe.

CRIMINAL EVIDENCE FRESH EVIDENCE INDECENT ASSAULT MEDICAL EVIDENCE MEDICAL REPORTS OFFENCES AGAINST CHILDREN

May 1, 2015

Fresh evidence which cast doubt on the credibility of a complainant’s evidence had sufficient impact on the safety of a conviction for rape for it to be quashed. However, the evidence did not have the same impact on the complainant’s credibility in respect of allegations of sexual assault, which were upheld.

ADMISSIBILITY CREDIBILITY CRIMINAL APPEAL ACT 1968 s.23 CRIMINAL EVIDENCE FRESH EVIDENCE MEDICAL EVIDENCE RAPE SEXUAL ASSAULT

April 15, 2014

A medical expert’s opinion that a 15-year-old girl’s injury to her hymen was diagnostic of blunt force trauma from sexual penetration had not been materially inaccurate and had not misled the jury in the trial of the appellant for raping the girl.

CRIMINAL EVIDENCE FRESH EVIDENCE MEDICAL EVIDENCE MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS RAPE RELIABILITY RELIABILITY OF EXPERT MEDICAL EVIDENCE AT TRIAL

October 17, 2008

A conviction for offences of rape and indecent assault of a child was safe despite fresh evidence that questioned the basis for the expert medical evidence at trial, as it did not undermine the evidence and credibility of the victim.

ADMISSIBILITY APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION CHILD SEX OFFENCES CRIMINAL APPEAL ACT 1968 s.23(1) CRIMINAL EVIDENCE CRIMINAL LAW EFFECT OF FRESH EXPERT EVIDENCE ON SAFETY OF CONVICTION EXPERT EVIDENCE FRESH EVIDENCE INDECENT ASSAULT MEDICAL EVIDENCE RAPE RAPE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT OF CHILD s.2(3) s.23(2) s.23(2)(a) s.23(2)(d) SEXUAL ACTIVITY WITH CHILDREN

July 10, 2001

Section 58 Crime and Disorder Act 1998 did not have retrospective effect; therefore licence periods could not extended under that provision for offences which occurred before 30 September 1998.

ADMISSIONS CHARACTER CONTRACEPTIVE PILL CRIMINAL EVIDENCE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CROSS-EXAMINATION DEFENCE COUNSEL TACTICS EARLIER COMPLAINT EXTENDED LICENCE PERIOD FAILURE TO SEEK LEAVE TO QUESTION RAPE VICTIM ON SEXUAL HISTORY JURY DIRECTIONS JURY DIRECTIONS ON RECENT COMPLAINT MEDICAL EVIDENCE RAPE S.58 CRIME AND DISORDER ACT 1998 SENTENCING SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR SEXUAL EXPERIENCE SEXUAL OFFENCES SEXUAL OFFENCES (AMENDMENT) ACT 1976 VICTIMS

Contact Stephen

Please use the form below to make contact. Your email will be responded to promptly (we endeavour to respond to all email enquiries within one hour). Alternatively, you can call Stephen's firm, Twelve Tabulae Limited, on +44 (0) 203 846 5801.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

 

"HISTORIC" OFFENCES ABUSE OF POSITION OF TRUST ADMISSIBILITY AGGRAVATING FEATURES ASSAULT BY PENETRATION ATTEMPTS BAD CHARACTER BUGGERY CAUSING CHILDREN TO ENGAGE IN SEXUAL ACTIVITY CHILDREN CHILD SEX OFFENCES CONSENT CREDIBILITY CRIMINAL EVIDENCE CRIMINAL LAW CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CROSS-EXAMINATION DANGEROUSNESS DELAY EXTENDED SENTENCES FRESH EVIDENCE GUILTY PLEAS HUMAN RIGHTS IMPRISONMENT FOR PUBLIC PROTECTION INCONSISTENT VERDICTS INDECENT ASSAULT INDECENT PHOTOGRAPHS OF CHILDREN JURY DIRECTIONS MINIMUM TERM PREVIOUS CONVICTIONS RAPE RAPE OF CHILD UNDER 13 RIGHT TO RESPECT FOR PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE SENTENCE LENGTH SENTENCING SENTENCING GUIDELINES SEXUAL ACTIVITY WITH CHILDREN SEXUAL ASSAULT SEXUAL ASSAULT OF CHILD UNDER 13 SEXUAL OFFENCES SEXUAL OFFENCES PREVENTION ORDERS SUMMING UP TOTALITY OF SENTENCE UNDUE LENIENCY YOUNG OFFENDERS