Certain conditions of a sexual harm prevention order imposed on an offender who had committed sexual offences against children, which restricted his use of computers, mobile phones with internet access and remote storage, were quashed as they were disproportionate, unenforceable and did not give effect to the statutory purpose.
CHILD SEX OFFENCES CLOUD COMPUTING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INTERNET MEETING CHILDREN FOLLOWING SEXUAL GROOMING OPPRESSION PENOLOGY AND CRIMINOLOGY PROPORTIONALITY SENTENCING SENTENCING POWERS SEXUAL GROOMING SEXUAL HARM PREVENTION ORDERS VICTIM SURCHARGE
A conviction for sexual assault was safe where an offender’s original solicitors had failed to obtain medical evidence showing that he was a diabetic and suggesting that his medical condition affected the answers he had given in interview, during which he had made partial admissions. The jury had been persuaded by the evidence the complainant gave, who had no reason to have lied.
APPEALS AGAINST CONVICTION CRIMINAL PROCEDURE FRESH EVIDENCE OPPRESSION POLICE INTERVIEWS SEXUAL ASSAULT
Please use the form below to make contact. Your email will be responded to promptly (we endeavour to respond to all email enquiries within one hour). Alternatively, you can call Stephen's firm, Twelve Tabulae Limited, on +44 (0) 203 846 5801.