A judge had not erred in refusing to sever an indictment containing counts relating to separate incidents of murder and sexual assault. The incidents were broadly similar and close in time and there were a number of very significant similarities. The issue as to whether they were wholly disconnected was a matter for the jury.
ADMISSIBILITY COINCIDENCE CRIMINAL EVIDENCE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 2003 s.101 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES 2014 r.14.2(3) CROSS-ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE INDICTMENTS MURDER Pt 1 s.103 s.3 s.31 s.53 SEVERANCE SEXUAL ASSAULT SIMILARITIES BETWEEN ATTACKS ON YOUNG FEMALE VICTIMS
Where a defendant, charged with committing sexual offences against his stepdaughters, had attacked the character of one of the victims, the judge had been entitled to allow the prosecution to admit evidence of the defendant’s previous convictions for non-sexual offences in accordance with the Criminal Justice Act 2003 s.101(1)(g).
ADMISSIBILITY ADMISSIBILITY OF DEFENDANT’S PREVIOUS CONVICTIONS UNDER S.101(1)(G) CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 2003 ATTACKS ON CHARACTER ATTACKS ON CHARACTER OF VICTIM BAD CHARACTER CHILD SEX OFFENCES CRIMINAL EVIDENCE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 2003 s.101(1)(g) JURY DIRECTIONS PREVIOUS CONVICTIONS PROPENSITY s.101 s.103
The erroneous admission of disputed bad character evidence by a trial judge had resulted in the trial of collateral issues which significantly contributed to the lengthening of a trial such that it had been very difficult for the jury to maintain focus. Accordingly, the conviction for rape, sexual assault, false imprisonment, threatening to kill and poisoning was unsafe.
ADMISSIBILITY BAD CHARACTER CRIMINAL EVIDENCE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 2003 s.101(1)(d) CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES 2005 r.3.10(h) EFFECT OF ADMISSION OF DISPUTED BAD CHARACTER EVIDENCE ON LENGTH OF TRIAL JURY DIRECTIONS LENGTH OF PROCEEDINGS POLICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE ACT 1984 s.74(3) r.1.1(2)(e) r.1.2(1)(a) r.3.5(2)(b) r.31.1(2) RAPE ALLEGATIONS s.101 s.101(1) s.101(1)(b) s.101(1)(c) s.101(1)(f) s.101(1)(g) s.101(3) s.103 s.103(1)(a) s.107 s.78 SEXUAL OFFENCES TRIAL OF SATELLITE ISSUES
Where a judge had given a direction to the jury that it was not to convict the defendant only on the basis of his similar previous conviction and, looking at the matter overall, the judge had properly admitted evidence of the previous conviction under the Criminal Justice Act 2003 s.101(1)(g).
ADMISSIBILITY ADMISSION OF EVIDENCE OF PREVIOUS CONVICTION UNDER S.101(1)(G) CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 2003 APPROPRIATENESS OF ADMISSION IN LIGHT OF RELEVANT JURY DIRECTION CRIMINAL EVIDENCE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 2003 s.101(1)(d) CRIMINAL PROCEDURE GUILTY PLEAS JURY DIRECTIONS PREVIOUS CONVICTIONS s.101(1)(g) s.101(3) s.101(4) s.103 SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT 2003
The judge had been wrong to admit documents, prepared by police officers, giving details of methods used in the commission of offences of which the appellant had been previously convicted, but the appellant’s convictions for the instant offences were nevertheless safe. It was important that the formal procedures referred to in R. v Hanson (Nicky) (2005) EWCA Crim 824 , (2005) 1 W.L.R. 3169 were followed.
ADMISSIBILITY ADMISSIBILITY OF INFORMATION ABOUT OFFENCES RETRIEVED FROM POLICE COMPUTER SYSTEM AGREEMENTS AS TO RELEVANT CIRCUMSTANCES OF PREVIOUS CONVICTIONS CASE MANAGEMENT COMPLAINANTS CRIMINAL EVIDENCE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 2003 s.117 CRIMINAL LAW METHODS USED POLICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE ACT 1984 POLICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE ACT 1984 s.73 PREVIOUS CONVICTIONS PROPENSITY RELEVANT SEXUAL OFFENCES REQUIREMENT FOR STATEMENT BY PREVIOUS COMPLAINANT OF SEXUAL OFFENCE s.101 s.101(1)(d) s.101(d) s.103 s.103(1) s.103(1)(a) s.114(1) s.116(2) S.116(2) CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 2003 S.117 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 2003 s.117(1) s.117(1)(a) s.2(b) SEXUAL ASSAULTS SEXUAL OFFENCES VICTIMS WITNESS STATEMENTS
There was no power to add an extended sentence to a detention and training order under the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 s.85 .
ADDITION OF EXTENDED PERIOD OF LICENCE TO DETENTION AND TRAINING ORDERS CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1991 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1991 s.39(2) DETENTION AND TRAINING ORDERS EXTENDED LICENCE PERIODS EXTENDED SENTENCES EXTENSION PERIODS INDECENCY INDECENCY WITH A CHILD INDECENCY WITH CHILD POWERS OF CRIMINAL COURTS (SENTENCING) ACT 2000 s.85 s.101 s.101(5) S.101(5) POWERS OF CRIMINAL COURTS (SENTENCING) ACT 2000 s.102 s.103 s.103(1) s.105 s.106 s.33 s.39 S.39(2) CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1991 s.43(3) s.44(3) s.76 S.85 POWERS OF CRIMINAL COURTS (SENTENCING) ACT 2000 s.85(1) s.85(1)(b) s.85(2) s.85(5) s.91 SENTENCING SENTENCING POWERS SEXUAL OFFENCES UNLAWFUL SENTENCES
The Court of Appeal gave guidelines for imposing extended periods of licence under s.85 Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000.
CONSECUTIVE SENTENCES CRIMINAL LAW CRIMINAL PROCEDURE EXTENDED PERIODS OF LICENCE EXTENDED SENTENCES GUIDELINES INDECENT ASSAULT LONGER THAN COMMENSURATE SENTENCES POWERS OF CRIMINAL COURTS (SENTENCING) ACT 2000 s.80(2)(b) PROPORTIONALITY PROTECTING MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC FROM DEATH OR PERSONAL INJURY RISK OF REOFFENDING s.103 s.116 s.161 s.161(2) s.161(4) S.58 AND S.60 CRIME AND DISORDER ACT 1998 s.80(2)(a) s.85 S.85 POWERS OF CRIMINAL COURT (SENTENCING) ACT 2000 s.85(1)(b) s.85(2) s.85(3) SECURING REHABILITATION SENTENCING SERIOUS HARM TO THE PUBLIC SEXUAL OFFENCES VIOLENCE
Please use the form below to make contact. Your email will be responded to promptly (we endeavour to respond to all email enquiries within one hour). Alternatively, you can call Stephen's firm, Twelve Tabulae Limited, on +44 (0) 203 846 5801.