Top Rape Defence Barrister

R (on the application of NE) (Claimant) v BIRMINGHAM MAGISTRATES’ COURT (Defendant) & CHIEF CONSTABLE OF THE WEST MIDLANDS (Interested Party) : R (on the application of NM) (Claimant) v BIRMINGHAM MAGISTRATES COURT (Defendant) & CHIEF CONSTABLE OF THE WEST MIDLANDS (Interested Party) (2015)

A person subject to the notification requirements of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 who wished to challenge a decision of a magistrates’ court to uphold a refusal to review the notification requirements should bring an appeal by way of case stated rather than pursue an application for judicial review.

HAMILL (Claimant) v CHELMSFORD MAGISTRATES’ COURT (Defendant) & CHIEF CONSTABLE OF ESSEX (Interested Party) (2014)

Magistrates had erred in dismissing the appeal of a convicted sex offender against a decision of a detective, acting on behalf of the chief constable, not to end the offender’s notification requirements.

Contact Stephen Vullo KC

Please use the form below to make contact. Your email will be responded to promptly (we endeavour to respond to all email enquiries within one hour). Alternatively, call Stephen's firm on +44 (0) 203 846 5801.

Your name*
First Last
Your email address:*
Enter Email Confirm Email
Your telephone number*
Your message for Stephen*
Comments
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.