Top Rape Barrister and Leading Criminal KC
Call now: +44 (0) 203 846 5801
≡
  • Home
  • Expertise
    • Rape Defence Barrister
    • Sexual Assault
      • Assault By Penetration Defence Barrister
      • Assault By Touching Defence Barrister
      • Administering Substances Defence Barrister
    • Underage sex
      • Grooming
    • Exploitation
    • Porn / Voyeurism
  • Criminal Appeals
  • Bail
  • Direct Access
  • Contact
  •  Call +44 (0) 203 846 5801
Top Criminal Barrister QC and Leading Rape Defence Counsel

HONEST BELIEF

April 9, 2014

A trial judge had correctly ruled that the contents of a conversation revealing details about a rape victim’s previous sexual behaviour were not admissible under the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 s.41.

ABUSE OF POSITION OF TRUST ADMISSIBILITY CONSENT CRIMINAL EVIDENCE CRIMINAL LAW HONEST BELIEF RAPE SENTENCE LENGTH SENTENCING SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR YOUTH JUSTICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE ACT 1999 s.41

February 15, 2005

Where an appellant relied on honest belief that the victim to an indecent assault was willing to consent, whilst evidence of the victim’s previous sexual behaviour was relevant to that belief the judge had a discretion whether to allow cross-examination and had to take into account whether refusal might render the conclusion of the jury unsafe.

CONSENT CRIMINAL EVIDENCE CRIMINAL LAW CROSS-EXAMINATION DEFENDANT SEEKING TO CROSS EXAMINE VICTIM ON BEHAVIOUR IN NIGHTCLUB DISCRETION HONEST BELIEF INDECENT ASSAULT PREVIOUS SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR RELEVANCE TO DEFENCE S.41 YOUTH JUSTICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE ACT 1999

December 16, 2004

On a charge of buggery with a male under the age of 16 pursuant to the Sexual Offences Act 1956 s.12 , an appellant was entitled to plead in defence that he honestly believed the complainant to be over the age of 16. The s.12 offence was not a strict liability offence.

AGE AVAILABILITY OF DEFENCE OF HONEST BELIEF BELIEF AS TO AGE OF COMPLAINANT BUGGERY CRIMINAL LAW CRIMINAL LIABILITY DEFENCES HONEST BELIEF HONEST BELIEF VICTIM OVER 16 YEARS OLD IMPOSITION OF STRICT LIABILITY INTENTION OF PARLIAMENT MENS REA MENTAL ELEMENT s.1 s.10 S.12 SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT 1956 s.14 s.14(1) s.14(2) s.14(4) S.143(1) CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND PUBLIC ORDER ACT 1994 S.3 SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT 1967 s.5 S.5 SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT 1956 s.6 S.6 SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT 1956 s.6(3) s.7 SEXUAL OFFENCES SEXUAL OFFENCES (AMENDMENT) ACT 2000 SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT 1956 s.12 SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT 1967

Contact Stephen

Please use the form below to make contact. Your email will be responded to promptly (we endeavour to respond to all email enquiries within one hour). Alternatively, you can call Stephen's firm, Twelve Tabulae Limited, on +44 (0) 203 846 5801.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

 

"HISTORIC" OFFENCES ABUSE OF POSITION OF TRUST ADMISSIBILITY AGGRAVATING FEATURES ASSAULT BY PENETRATION ATTEMPTS BAD CHARACTER BUGGERY CAUSING CHILDREN TO ENGAGE IN SEXUAL ACTIVITY CHILDREN CHILD SEX OFFENCES CONSENT CREDIBILITY CRIMINAL EVIDENCE CRIMINAL LAW CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CROSS-EXAMINATION DANGEROUSNESS DELAY EXTENDED SENTENCES FRESH EVIDENCE GUILTY PLEAS HUMAN RIGHTS IMPRISONMENT FOR PUBLIC PROTECTION INCONSISTENT VERDICTS INDECENT ASSAULT INDECENT PHOTOGRAPHS OF CHILDREN JURY DIRECTIONS MINIMUM TERM PREVIOUS CONVICTIONS RAPE RAPE OF CHILD UNDER 13 RIGHT TO RESPECT FOR PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE SENTENCE LENGTH SENTENCING SENTENCING GUIDELINES SEXUAL ACTIVITY WITH CHILDREN SEXUAL ASSAULT SEXUAL ASSAULT OF CHILD UNDER 13 SEXUAL OFFENCES SEXUAL OFFENCES PREVENTION ORDERS SUMMING UP TOTALITY OF SENTENCE UNDUE LENIENCY YOUNG OFFENDERS