INTERVENTION

November 23, 2018

Although a judge had unnecessarily and improperly intervened during a defendant’s examination-in-chief, the interventions were not so significant as to materially impair the defendant’s ability to put his case before the jury. The judge’s interventions, combined with deficiencies in his summing-up, had not deprived the defendant of a fair trial.

CONSENT CRIMINAL PROCEDURE EXAMINATION IN CHIEF INTERVENTION JUDGES RAPE RIGHT TO FAIR TRIAL SUMMING UP

Contact Stephen

Please use the form below to make contact. Your email will be responded to promptly (we endeavour to respond to all email enquiries within one hour). Alternatively, you can call Stephen's firm, Twelve Tabulae Limited, on +44 (0) 203 846 5801.

Enter your name:*
First Last
Enter your contact email address*
Enter Email Confirm Email
Type your message*
Solve the math challenge to prove you're not a bot!
Name
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.