A sentence of 10 years’ imprisonment, imposed following convictions for four offences of rape and two offences of assault occasioning actual bodily harm, was increased to 16 years’ imprisonment with an extended licence period of five years, where the offender was dangerous and had committed the offences while serving a community sentence for a previous sexual offence.
ABUSE OF POSITION OF TRUST ACTUAL BODILY HARM AGGRAVATING FEATURES DANGEROUSNESS EXTENDED SENTENCES RAPE SENTENCING UNDUE LENIENCY
Alleged failures in pre-trial investigation procedure did not affect the safety of the convictions of soldiers found guilty of kidnapping, sexual assault, theft and assault occasioning actual bodily harm.
ACTUAL BODILY HARM ARMED FORCES ARMED FORCES INVESTIGATION ASSAULT AND SEXUAL ASSAULT CRIMINAL EVIDENCE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE DISCLOSURE FAILURE TO KEEP CONTEMPORANEOUS RECORD OF MATERIAL OBTAINED DURING INVESTIGATION FRESH EVIDENCE GERMANY KIDNAPPING PROSECUTION DISCLOSURE SAFETY OF CONVICTION FOR KIDNAPPING SENTENCE LENGTH SENTENCING SEXUAL ASSAULT THEFT TOTALITY OF SENTENCE
Where there had been confusion during the jury’s return of verdicts on four counts of an indictment against two co-defendants, and a verdict against a count of kidnap was not formally entered against one defendant, that defendant had not been convicted of kidnap. The court therefore ordered the Crown Court record to be amended accordingly and the defendant’s sentence for kidnap was quashed.
ACTUAL BODILY HARM APPEALS AGAINST CONVICTION ASSAULT CO-ACCUSED CONVICTIONS COUNTS CRIMINAL PROCEDURE KIDNAPPING RAPE ROBBERY SENTENCING VERDICTS
A judge had not failed to direct a jury properly on the burden and standard of proof in relation to offences of false imprisonment, assault occasioning bodily harm and rape where he had effectively directed the jury that they had to make a choice whether to believe the evidence of the complainant or the defendants.
ACTUAL BODILY HARM ASSAULT BURDEN OF PROOF CRIMINAL EVIDENCE FALSE IMPRISONMENT RAPE STANDARD OF PROOF SUMMING UP
A sentence of imprisonment for public protection with a minimum term of three years and 172 days, imposed for two counts of rape, was upheld but the minimum term was reduced to two years and 172 days because the judge had not made a satisfactory reduction for the offender’s co-operation with the prosecution in an unconnected murder trial.
ACTUAL BODILY HARM DISCOUNT FOR GIVING PROSECUTION EVIDENCE IN UNCONNECTED MURDER TRIAL DISCOUNTED SENTENCES IMPRISONMENT FOR PUBLIC PROTECTION RAPE SENTENCING SERIOUS ORGANISED CRIME AND POLICE ACT 2005