A jury had not acted inconsistently in finding two young offenders guilty of oral rape but not guilty of sexual assault, even though the charges represented a sequence of events over the course of a 30-minute period and the central issue was consent. On the evidence, there was no logical inconsistency in the verdicts.
ACQUITTAL ON OTHER CHARGES OF ORAL RAPE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT ARISING OUT OF 30-MINUTE INCIDENT CONSENT CONVICTION ON ONE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE INCONSISTENT VERDICTS NORTHERN IRELAND RAPE SENTENCING STARTING POINT WHETHER VERDICTS LOGICALLY INCONSISTENT YOUNG OFFENDERS
Please use the form below to make contact. Your email will be responded to promptly (we endeavour to respond to all email enquiries within one hour). Alternatively, you can call Stephen's firm, Twelve Tabulae Limited, on +44 (0) 203 846 5801.