Sentences of nine years’ imprisonment were neither unduly lenient nor manifestly excessive for two offenders who had raped an intoxicated young woman in an alleyway outside a nightclub. It had been appropriate not to impose a consecutive sentence for digital anal penetration by one of the offenders.
AGGRAVATING FEATURES ASSAULT BY PENETRATION CONCURRENT SENTENCES RAPE RAPE OF INTOXICATED YOUNG WOMAN OUTSIDE NIGHTCLUB SENTENCE LENGTH SENTENCING UNDUE LENIENCY
Where an offender made indecent images of children at a variety of levels of seriousness, a sentence was to be imposed on the most serious category of counts, taking into account the totality of the offending and having regard to aggravating and mitigating factors, before credit was given for any guilty pleas. Concurrent sentences were then to be imposed on the remaining counts.
CHANGE OF PLEA CONCURRENT SENTENCES GUILTY PLEAS INDECENT PHOTOGRAPHS OF CHILDREN REDUCTION OF SENTENCE SENTENCING
A ten-year extended sentence with a custodial period of five years was appropriate for offences relating to the sexual abuse of two young girls over a period of some five years.
ABUSE OF TWO GIRLS OVER FOUR-YEAR PERIOD CHILD SEX OFFENCES CONCURRENT SENTENCES EXTENDED SENTENCES SENTENCE LENGTH SENTENCING TOTALITY OF SENTENCE
Please use the form below to make contact. Your email will be responded to promptly (we endeavour to respond to all email enquiries within one hour). Alternatively, you can call Stephen's firm, Twelve Tabulae Limited, on +44 (0) 203 846 5801.