There was no power to add an extended sentence to a detention and training order under the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 s.85 .
Call now: +44 (0) 203 846 5801
There was no power to add an extended sentence to a detention and training order under the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 s.85 .
ADDITION OF EXTENDED PERIOD OF LICENCE TO DETENTION AND TRAINING ORDERS CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1991 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1991 s.39(2) DETENTION AND TRAINING ORDERS EXTENDED LICENCE PERIODS EXTENDED SENTENCES EXTENSION PERIODS INDECENCY INDECENCY WITH A CHILD INDECENCY WITH CHILD POWERS OF CRIMINAL COURTS (SENTENCING) ACT 2000 s.85 s.101 s.101(5) S.101(5) POWERS OF CRIMINAL COURTS (SENTENCING) ACT 2000 s.102 s.103 s.103(1) s.105 s.106 s.33 s.39 S.39(2) CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1991 s.43(3) s.44(3) s.76 S.85 POWERS OF CRIMINAL COURTS (SENTENCING) ACT 2000 s.85(1) s.85(1)(b) s.85(2) s.85(5) s.91 SENTENCING SENTENCING POWERS SEXUAL OFFENCES UNLAWFUL SENTENCES
A conditional discharge was unduly lenient for offences of indecent assault with a female under 13 years old and indecency with a child.
AGGRAVATING FEATURES CONDITIONAL DISCHARGES COURSE OF CONDUCT CRIMINAL PROCEDURE IMPRISONMENT INDECENCY WITH A CHILD INDECENCY WITH STEPCHILD INDECENT ASSAULT INDECENT ASSAULTS OFFENCE TAKING PLACE 30 YEARS PREVIOUSLY S.36 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1988 SENTENCE LENGTH SENTENCES SENTENCING SEXUAL OFFENCES STEP-FATHERS STEPCHILDREN UNDUE LENIENCY UNDULY LENIENT
A judge had exercised his discretion fairly under s.41 Youth and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 by ruling as admissible certain evidence about sexual abuse on complainant children by persons other than their parents against whom criminal proceedings had been brought.
ABUSE ADMISSIBILITY APPEALS CHILDREN COMPLAINTS CONVICTIONS CREDIT CRIMINAL EVIDENCE CRIMINAL LAW CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CROSS-EXAMINATION DISCRETION EXCLUSION EXERCISE GUILT INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS INDECENCY WITH A CHILD INDECENT ASSAULT INNOCENCE INTERVIEW JURY LEAVE MISCONDUCT OTHERS PACE 1984 PARENTS PERMISSION PROCEDURAL IMPROPRIETY PROOF QUESTIONING RELEVANCE RIGHT TO QUESTION CHILD WITNESSES IN RELATION TO PRIOR COMPLAINTS OF ABUSE S.41 YOUTH AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE ACT 1999 s.42(1)(c) S.78 POLICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE ACT 1984 SEXUAL OFFENCES UNSAFE VIDEOS YOUTH JUSTICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE ACT 1999 s.41
A sentence in excess of the statutory maximum of ten years should not have been imposed where it resulted in an extended sentence of 18 years, of which 12 years was the custodial term for sex offences against children. A term of ten years, of which six years was the period of imprisonment and four years was the extended licence period, was imposed instead.
CHILDREN COMMENSURATE SENTENCES CONSECUTIVE EXTENDED PERIODS CONSECUTIVE SENTENCES CRIMINAL LAW CRIMINAL PROCEDURE EXTENDED LICENCE PERIODS EXTENDED SENTENCES GOOD PRACTICE INDECENCY WITH A CHILD INDECENT ASSAULT INDECENT ASSAULT ON A FEMALE S.85 POWERS OF CRIMINAL COURTS (SENTENCING) ACT 2000 SENTENCING STATUTORY MAXIMUMS SUFFERED HARM
Please use the form below to make contact. Your email will be responded to promptly (we endeavour to respond to all email enquiries within one hour). Alternatively, you can call Stephen's firm, Twelve Tabulae Limited, on +44 (0) 203 846 5801.