Certain conditions of a sexual harm prevention order imposed on an offender who had committed sexual offences against children, which restricted his use of computers, mobile phones with internet access and remote storage, were quashed as they were disproportionate, unenforceable and did not give effect to the statutory purpose.
CHILD SEX OFFENCES CLOUD COMPUTING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INTERNET MEETING CHILDREN FOLLOWING SEXUAL GROOMING OPPRESSION PENOLOGY AND CRIMINOLOGY PROPORTIONALITY SENTENCING SENTENCING POWERS SEXUAL GROOMING SEXUAL HARM PREVENTION ORDERS VICTIM SURCHARGE
A sexual offences prevention order was varied because its terms were wider than was necessary and duplicated the regime already in place under the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006.
DISCLOSURE AND BARRING SERVICE INDECENT PHOTOGRAPHS OF CHILDREN INTERNET NECESSITY OVERLAP WITH REGIME UNDER SAFEGUARDING VULNERABLE GROUPS ACT 2006 SAFEGUARDING VULNERABLE GROUPS ACT 2006 Sch.3 SENTENCING SEXUAL OFFENCES PREVENTION ORDERS TERMS AND CONDITIONS WHETHER TERMS OF SEXUAL OFFENCES PREVENTION ORDER WERE WIDER THAN NECESSARY
In an attempted sexual grooming case where the offender was caught by a newspaper sting operation and there was no actual victim, a sentence of 18 months’ imprisonment on a guilty plea was appropriate for a man of previous good character who had been subjected to the humiliation of exposure in the national press.
ATTEMPTS CHILD SEX OFFENCES INTERNET NEWSPAPER STING OPERATION POSED AS 17-YEAR-OLD IN TEENAGERS’ INTERNET CHAT ROOM SENTENCE LENGTH SENTENCING SEXUAL GROOMING
Please use the form below to make contact. Your email will be responded to promptly (we endeavour to respond to all email enquiries within one hour). Alternatively, you can call Stephen's firm, Twelve Tabulae Limited, on +44 (0) 203 846 5801.