There was no logical inconsistency between an offender’s conviction on two counts of indecent assault upon a girl, and the jury’s acquittal in relation to the remaining 16 counts on the indictment.
There was no logical inconsistency between an offender’s conviction on two counts of indecent assault upon a girl, and the jury’s acquittal in relation to the remaining 16 counts on the indictment.
CHILD SEX OFFENCES CRIMINAL PROCEDURE HISTORICAL SEXUAL OFFENCES INCONSISTENT VERDICTS INDECENT ASSAULT JURIES NO LOGICAL INCONSISTENCY IN VERDICTS WITNESS EVIDENCE
Please use the form below to make contact. Your email will be responded to promptly (we endeavour to respond to all email enquiries within one hour). Alternatively, you can call Stephen's firm, Twelve Tabulae Limited, on +44 (0) 203 846 5801.