Convictions for rape and indecent assault were quashed where the Crown’s reliance on hearsay evidence of bad character in the form of statements containing allegations of rape had circumvented the restrictions on hearsay evidence in the Criminal Justice Act 2003.
ADMISSIBILITY ADMISSIBILITY UNDER S.114 AND S.116 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 2003 BAD CHARACTER CRIMINAL EVIDENCE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 2003 s.114(1)(d) HEARSAY EVIDENCE HEARSAY EVIDENCE CONTAINING UNPROVEN ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT Part 2 PREJUDICE RAPE s.101 s.114(1) s.114(2) s.114(2)(g) s.116 s.116(1) s.116(2) s.116(2)(a) s.116(2)(e) s.116(4) s.116(4)(b) s.9(8)
The judge had been wrong to admit documents, prepared by police officers, giving details of methods used in the commission of offences of which the appellant had been previously convicted, but the appellant’s convictions for the instant offences were nevertheless safe. It was important that the formal procedures referred to in R. v Hanson (Nicky) (2005) EWCA Crim 824 , (2005) 1 W.L.R. 3169 were followed.
ADMISSIBILITY ADMISSIBILITY OF INFORMATION ABOUT OFFENCES RETRIEVED FROM POLICE COMPUTER SYSTEM AGREEMENTS AS TO RELEVANT CIRCUMSTANCES OF PREVIOUS CONVICTIONS CASE MANAGEMENT COMPLAINANTS CRIMINAL EVIDENCE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 2003 s.117 CRIMINAL LAW METHODS USED POLICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE ACT 1984 POLICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE ACT 1984 s.73 PREVIOUS CONVICTIONS PROPENSITY RELEVANT SEXUAL OFFENCES REQUIREMENT FOR STATEMENT BY PREVIOUS COMPLAINANT OF SEXUAL OFFENCE s.101 s.101(1)(d) s.101(d) s.103 s.103(1) s.103(1)(a) s.114(1) s.116(2) S.116(2) CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 2003 S.117 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 2003 s.117(1) s.117(1)(a) s.2(b) SEXUAL ASSAULTS SEXUAL OFFENCES VICTIMS WITNESS STATEMENTS