CORRECT DIRECTION IN RELATION TO ASSESSMENT OF LIKELIHOOD OF COINCIDENCE

July 12, 2012

The court upheld the convictions of a male nurse for several counts of sexual assault upon women patients who were coming round after general anaesthetic in circumstances where the offender claimed that the complainants had experienced false memories as a side effect of the anaesthetic and the judge had given an appropriate direction to a jury in relation to its consideration of the evidence of several complainants for an assessment of the likelihood of the coincidence.

ASSAULT BY PENETRATION COINCIDENCE CORRECT DIRECTION IN RELATION TO ASSESSMENT OF LIKELIHOOD OF COINCIDENCE CRIMINAL EVIDENCE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ISSUE OF WHETHER COMPLAINANTS EXPERIENCING FALSE MEMORIES AS SIDE EFFECT OF ANAESTHETIC JURY DIRECTIONS NURSE ASSAULTING FEMALE PATIENTS COMING ROUND AFTER GENERAL ANAESTHETIC NURSES PROPENSITY s.3 SEXUAL ASSAULT SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT 2003 s.2

Contact Stephen

Please use the form below to make contact. Your email will be responded to promptly (we endeavour to respond to all email enquiries within one hour). Alternatively, you can call Stephen's firm, Twelve Tabulae Limited, on +44 (0) 203 846 5801.

Enter your name:*
First Last
Enter your contact email address*
Enter Email Confirm Email
Type your message*
CAPTCHA
Comments
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.