NOT GUILTY OF DIGITAL PENETRATION

November 19, 2013

It had not been logically inconsistent for a jury to find a man accused of sexual activity with a child guilty of having intercourse with her but not guilty of digitally penetrating her as they were separate incidents and the surrounding circumstances of the latter might have led the jury to be not sure beyond a reasonable doubt.

ALTERNATIVE VERDICTS CONSENT CRIMINAL LAW CRIMINAL PROCEDURE DEFENDANT GUILTY OF INTERCOURSE WITH CHILD INCONSISTENT VERDICTS INDICTMENTS NO INCONSISTENCY NOT GUILTY OF DIGITAL PENETRATION RAPE SEPARATE INCIDENTS SEXUAL ACTIVITY WITH CHILDREN

Contact Stephen

Please use the form below to make contact. Your email will be responded to promptly (we endeavour to respond to all email enquiries within one hour). Alternatively, you can call Stephen's firm, Twelve Tabulae Limited, on +44 (0) 141 2800504.

Enter your name:*
First Last
Enter your contact email address*
Enter Email Confirm Email
Type your message*
CAPTCHA
Email
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.