It was unjust for a Crown Court judge to order that a foreign travel order begin afresh from the date on which he had dismissed an appeal by an offender against that order. The order was to run from the date on which it had originally been made.
It was unjust for a Crown Court judge to order that a foreign travel order begin afresh from the date on which he had dismissed an appeal by an offender against that order. The order was to run from the date on which it had originally been made.
APPEAL REFUSED AGAINST ORDER IMPOSED ON RETURN TO UK COMMENCEMENT DATE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE FOREIGN TRAVEL ORDERS PENOLOGY AND CRIMINOLOGY RELEVANT COMMENCEMENT DATE s.114 s.115(2) s.117 s.117(3) s.117(5) s.118 s.118(5) s.119 s.119(2) s.122 s.97 SEXUAL ACTIVITY WITH CHILDREN SEXUAL HARM PREVENTION ORDERS SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT 2003 Pt 2 UK CITIZEN CONVICTED OF CHILD SEX OFFENCES ABROAD
Although a judge’s summing up and jury directions could have been more detailed and better tailored to the facts, they were not so deficient as to affect the safety of a conviction for the commission of sexual offences.
COLLUSION CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 2003 s.119(1) CRIMINAL PROCEDURE EFFECT OF SUMMING UP AND JURY DIRECTIONS ON SAFETY JURY DIRECTIONS NO CASE TO ANSWER PREVIOUS INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS s.114(2) s.119 SAFETY OF CONVICTION SEXUAL OFFENCES SUMMING UP
Please use the form below to make contact. Your email will be responded to promptly (we endeavour to respond to all email enquiries within one hour). Alternatively, you can call Stephen's firm, Twelve Tabulae Limited, on +44 (0) 203 846 5801.