Top Rape Barrister and Leading Criminal KC
Call now: +44 (0) 141 2800504
≡
  • Home
  • Expertise
    • Rape Defence Barrister
    • Sexual Assault
      • Assault By Penetration Defence Barrister
      • Assault By Touching Defence Barrister
      • Administering Substances Defence Barrister
    • Underage sex
      • Grooming
    • Exploitation
    • Porn / Voyeurism
  • Criminal Appeals
  • Bail
  • Direct Access
  • Contact
  •  Call +44 (0) 141 2800504
Top Criminal Barrister QC and Leading Rape Defence Counsel

s.53

October 9, 2014

The court gave guidance on the procedure to be followed by the judge when deciding whether the cross-examination of a vulnerable witness was appropriate.

CHILD SEX OFFENCES CRIMINAL EVIDENCE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CROSS-EXAMINATION HUMAN RIGHTS PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED BY JUDGE WHEN DETERMINING APPROPRIATENESS OF CROSS-EXAMINATION RIGHT TO FAIR TRIAL s.27(5) s.28 s.53 s.54 s.54(3) s.54(6) VIDEO EVIDENCE VULNERABLE AND INTIMIDATED WITNESSES YOUTH JUSTICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE ACT 1999 s.27

January 29, 2014

A judge had not erred in refusing to sever an indictment containing counts relating to separate incidents of murder and sexual assault. The incidents were broadly similar and close in time and there were a number of very significant similarities. The issue as to whether they were wholly disconnected was a matter for the jury.

ADMISSIBILITY COINCIDENCE CRIMINAL EVIDENCE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 2003 s.101 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES 2014 r.14.2(3) CROSS-ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE INDICTMENTS MURDER Pt 1 s.103 s.3 s.31 s.53 SEVERANCE SEXUAL ASSAULT SIMILARITIES BETWEEN ATTACKS ON YOUNG FEMALE VICTIMS

April 28, 2010

Alleged offences relating to prostitution and people trafficking as specified in a European arrest warrant for which the appellant’s extradition to Lithuania was sought amounted to extradition offences by virtue of the Extradition Act 2003 s.64(3). All the conditions of s.64(3) had been met, notably as the conduct alleged in the warrant had partly occurred in Lithuania and would constitute one or more offences under English law.

EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANTS EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS 1950 art.7 EXTRADITION EXTRADITION ACT 2003 s.64 EXTRADITION OFFENCES EXTRADITION ORDERS NO PUNISHMENT WITHOUT LAW OFFENCES SPECIFIED IN ARREST WARRANT AMOUNTING TO EXTRADITION OFFENCES BY VIRTUE OF S.64(3) EXTRADITION ACT 2003 Part 1 PART OF CONDUCT OCCURRING IN REQUESTING STATE PROSTITUTION s.10 s.52 s.53 s.59(3) s.60 s.60(1) s.60(2) s.64(2) s.64(3) s.64(4) SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT 2003 s.59

Contact Stephen

Please use the form below to make contact. Your email will be responded to promptly (we endeavour to respond to all email enquiries within one hour). Alternatively, you can call Stephen's firm, Twelve Tabulae Limited, on +44 (0) 141 2800504.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

 

"HISTORIC" OFFENCES ABUSE OF POSITION OF TRUST ADMISSIBILITY AGGRAVATING FEATURES ASSAULT BY PENETRATION ATTEMPTS BAD CHARACTER BUGGERY CAUSING CHILDREN TO ENGAGE IN SEXUAL ACTIVITY CHILDREN CHILD SEX OFFENCES CONSENT CREDIBILITY CRIMINAL EVIDENCE CRIMINAL LAW CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CROSS-EXAMINATION DANGEROUSNESS DELAY EXTENDED SENTENCES FRESH EVIDENCE GUILTY PLEAS HUMAN RIGHTS IMPRISONMENT FOR PUBLIC PROTECTION INCONSISTENT VERDICTS INDECENT ASSAULT INDECENT PHOTOGRAPHS OF CHILDREN JURY DIRECTIONS MINIMUM TERM PREVIOUS CONVICTIONS RAPE RAPE OF CHILD UNDER 13 RIGHT TO RESPECT FOR PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE SENTENCE LENGTH SENTENCING SENTENCING GUIDELINES SEXUAL ACTIVITY WITH CHILDREN SEXUAL ASSAULT SEXUAL ASSAULT OF CHILD UNDER 13 SEXUAL OFFENCES SEXUAL OFFENCES PREVENTION ORDERS SUMMING UP TOTALITY OF SENTENCE UNDUE LENIENCY YOUNG OFFENDERS